Hell mate - I thought I just 'stated' that they HAD to be different!
Or was I being a bit obfuscatory as usual?
To cover my ample arse.
AndrewF
On 31/07/2005, at 12:56 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
>
> I think you mean "he implied" Earl old bean ... ;-)
>
> Chris
> ~~ >-)-
> C M I Barker
> Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
> +44 (0)7092 251126
> www.threeshoes.co.uk
> homepage.mac.com/zuiko
>
>
> On 30 Jul 2005, at 12:36, Earl Dunbar wrote:
>
>
>> Tony: As AndrewF inferred, the SL (slr) line of lenses are
>> cosmetically
>> different than the RF lenses. The Cameraquest site has plenty of
>> photos
>> that show the differences. I hadn't looked at the SL lenses for some
>> time, but it's an interesting lineup.
>>
>> EArl
>>
>>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|