[OM] Re: More on digital vs. film by one of the Landscape masters

[R. Jackson]

The rationale seems to be that digital is "good enough" to get the  
job done, as long as the job isn't held up to very intense scrutiny.  
I'm sure Ansel Adams would be proud... ;-)

On Jul 30, 2005, at 1:14 PM, Earl Dunbar wrote:

> My quick read was that for very large enlargements, the C@non files
> broke down quite noticeably, and the 4x5 held up well.


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================