Le samedi 30 Juillet 2005 13:19, Brian Swale a écrit :
> I think that for OMs, vibration has been the unsolved bugbear. Mostly
> unsolved - and for me it would still be unsolved were it not for the tests
> done and put on the 'net by Gary Reece; and for the information so freely
> given in this group - all of which has made a huge difference to my
> enjoyment of photography.
Could someone please expand a bit on that topic ? A while ago, I've been
responsible for a wet lab activity in a college, and we had a Pentax K1000
for 15 students, so I generaly let them use my own OM-1 as well to speed up
the turnover a bit. Clearly, while pentax pictures were "good enough", OM
pics were always a bit sharper. So I'm wondering under which circumstances
that vibration "bug" would show ; maybe on landscape pictures, tripod
mounted, long exposures ? But then, why would so many astrophotographers give
an arm and a leg to get an OM today ? I'm confused.
--
Manuel Viet
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|