Noise was just an example. As you would know from my other posts I
don't think that noise by itself is a very serious issue either. What
I was trying to say that since noise is easier to control from large
photo sites it shows that some makers of backs are not up to makers
of small sensors in many areas. Take a look here, about half way down
for a comparison between a 1DS and an Imacon back:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/ixpress.shtml
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On Jul 29, 2005, at 9:50 AM, AG Schnozz wrote:
> Not noise again. :( You think that just maybe the lack of noise
> is why the Canon is only 95% there? My E-1 is *NOISY* compared
> to an Canon image, but at least there is a nice usable
> transition at the "outer limits".
>
> Unfortunately it suffers in the other 95%...
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|