Mike wrote:
>>For a tiny light weight 300m the Tamron 300/4.5 mirror can't be beat.
>>
That's a new one on me. Do you mean 350/5.6?
>Gotta be really careful though. That little Tam mirror is capable of
>producing the worst bokeh imaginable. Pretty much renders the close
>focusing ability moot IMO.
>
>
True of all the mirror lenses, as far as I know. Capable of some nice
images, but even without donuts, OOF areas can do some interesting
doubling <http://galleries.moosemystic.net/Garden04/pages/3649_16.htm>.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|