And depth of field is an issue for me as a result of the sensor size.
Now lenses need to be ~ a stop faster in some situations to get shallow DOF.
Earl
R. Jackson wrote:
><snip>
>
>Sensor size is next up. Effective focal length multipliers from 1.5x
>to 2x make lens selection nightmarish. It's getting better, but it's
>still crazy. Don't want to multiply in your head? Kod@k DCS series
>(now discontinued), Cont@x N (now discontinued) or C@non's full-frame
>bodies ($8k? Is that about right?). Since the Cont@x is pretty much
>not an option, that leaves the DCS or the C@non meaning N!kon or
>C@non lenses. Now, I don't really know much about the former, but I
>do know that C@non's good glass is really pricey. The 24mm f1.4, for
>example, is over $1100. The 85mm f1.2 is $1500. I figured it up once
>and just the lenses to equal the glass in my Olympus kit would cost
>around $10k for an EOS.
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|