The problem with the ISO 100 grain may be just a mismatch with Brian's
scanner resolution. I think it's possible he might get better results
with ISO 200 as well. Despite what is probably larger grain on the 200
it might actually scan better.
Chuck Norcutt
GeeBee wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> Strange that you should get results so different from mine with a slower
> version of Vista. It would be hard to pin down the reason with so many
> variables but my local lab is all Agfa and he uses their chemicals, maybe
> that's the difference. Incidentally, he is struggling for continuity of
> supplies at the moment due to Agfas' financial difficulties so I may not be
> using it for much longer.
>
> --Graham
> --------------------------------------------------------
> From: "Brian Swale" <bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Subject: Welford Northamptonshire
>
>
>>Hi Graham
>>
>>I don't know how you get such fine results from Agfa Vista 200.
>>
>>I just shot a roll of Agfa Vista 100, and it's quite grainy in places. Not
>
> to my
>
>>liking at all.
>>
>>>Olympus OM2 SP : Zuiko 35-80mm f2.8 : Agfa Vista 200
>>>
>>>http://www.geebeephoto.com/2005/05219.htm
>>>
>>
>>Brian
>
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|