Subject: | [OM] Re: #220 |
---|---|
From: | "R. Jackson" <jackson.robert.r@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 13 Jul 2005 17:44:52 -0700 |
HA! Yeah, I'm sure it would have made an interesting action photo. ;-) On Jul 13, 2005, at 5:26 PM, Marc Lawrence wrote: > Yes, but it's a shame someone wasn't standing by with a camera > at Bakersfield, because, likewise, that too would have been > "a great photo". ;-) > > Cheers, > Marc > ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Discounted E-1s?, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: olympus Digest V2 #190, iddi |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: #220, Marc Lawrence |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Wanted: 90mm f/2, 18mm f/3.5, Walter Tani |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |