ScottGee1 wrote:
>Maybe it's the discipline that I learned in the old days, but I still
>strive to get an image a right as possible in the camera. Or maybe
>I'm too lazy to want to fuss with PS too much . . . ;o)
>
>hth/ScottGee1
>
>
Me too. I'm not sure if it's just my original training, or that
combined with the "garbage in/garbage out" that was such a mantra in the
early days of computing. I noticed in shooting the C2000 last week that
I let the camera meter the scene (both A and P), and ignored the
highlights which looked a bit blown on the LCD thingy. I did that
because the digi-experts here said that's what to do ... at least I
think that's what was said... I start to glaze over about the 3rd or 4th
post when it comes to digital workflow. I have yet to really work with
the image (which may end up in the current TOPE) to tame the highlights,
and I THINK the histogram looks OK, but I'll have to re-read some
threads to refresh my memory. Then throw in monitor calibration, etc...
Seems fussy to me, in my brain that keep saying "just get it right in
the camera".
Earl
Earl
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|