Jeff Keller wrote:
>A 48mm shift doesn't seem like much fun.
>
I don't remember about Mike, but I'm sure he said most of the Can*n
landscape people were using the full frame body, so it would still be a
24mm.
>But Mike's method of holding the lens fixed and shifting the body, then
>stitching the images together, could
>be a real winner. More pixels for the cost of time. It would effectively
>sacrifice the perspective correction though.
>
>
These are landscape shooters.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|