FWIW, I suspect in all such cases the premise is that the photographic activity
is documentary in purpose. However, I suspect that what is really going on is a
form of prior restraint on constitutionally protected free speech, with little
to no provable security benefit. - PLZ
On 11:46, ScottGee1 wrote:
>Is anyone on the list involved with law enforcement? Has Homeland
>Security issued some kind of blanket warnings regarding
>photographers?
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|