... Including paying USD2800 for a 24/3.5 on that auction site - in fact the
24/3.5 that was offered by the seller of the 4Ti that Ali drew attention to
last week. And the same buyer also popped for one of the Sinaron/Zuiko 35mm
shift lenses. Quite a week.
As revealed on the Fred Miranda thread that Jeff pointed out.
--
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of jowilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 16 June 2005 19:09
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Zuikos used by digital C*nons
Quoting Garth Wood <garth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Lemme change the punctuation on that last. "What? Are people
> *thinking*?" ;-)
>
>
> Garth
I've never been bitten with the feeling that I had to have the 21/2 because
the 21/3.5 is so good, though it would be nice to have one on the E-1 to
give the equivalent of a walkaround 42/2. The E-thing corruption now
runneth deep, so I can sort of understand the phenomenon among Canyon
owners.
Except for the C folks I know on this list, the C masses seem to be a
lemming-ish, variable lot, subject to many different kinds of indiscriminate
foolishness.
Joel W.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|