Der Eiserne Reiter wrote:
>Olli,
>
>just a thought: you might want to consider the 200/5. I love mine
>for quality & size. I got it in like new condition from a list
>member for US 100 (thanks, Ali !) and am really happy with it.
>
I too like the 200/5 a lot. It's such a perfect example of the original
OM philosophy of compactness. Even on paper, it's lots smaller and
lighter than the 200/4 and in the hand, the difference is substantial. I
went out shooting with OM-1, 50/1.8, 100/2.8 and 200/5 a while ago and
really enjoyed both the outing and the results.
The 200/4 makes more sense if using a 2XA, as they seem to work together
particularly well and f8 is less dim in the viewfinder than f10. At
least that's my rational for having both. {;o)
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|