I would hope Olympus would opt to put the IS in the camera body.
Joel W.
At 03:02 PM 6/7/2005 -0400, you wrote:
>There have been zero rumors about such a lens, and I follow them regularly.
>Unless something has slipped in under the radar, I think your acquaintance
>was mislead.
>
>Also, I'd be surprised if Olympus would introduce a 400mm lens as its first
>foray into IS. That's like an 800mm lens on a 35mm camera! Given that the
>300/2.8 is $7k, it'd be astronomical. Now if it was a 200/2 (400mm equiv),
>then I could believe that, except that it is too close to the 150/2. I'd
>expect to see the 150/2 with IS before any other lens. That would be a
>killer for Basketball or Fashion.
>
>Skip
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|