But in my hands, it was the 104 & 81 dimensions of the E-1, compared to
the E-300, that made a huge difference. I'm not saying I couldn't learn
to love the E-1, but the E-300 immediately felt a lot closer to the
OM-1, as you noted. I still don't believe that an OM-D is impossible.
Earl
Mark Dapoz wrote:
>On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Moose wrote:
>
>
>>Yeah, the E-1 is big and heavy and not in any way like an OM. The E300
>>is smaller and lighter and much closer to an OM in feel.
>>
>>
>
>The E-1 isn't that big:
>
>E-1: 141mm x 104mm x 81mm 660g
>OM-1: 136mm x 83mm x 50mm 510g
>E-300: 146.5mm x 85mm x 64mm 580g
>
>Sure the E-300 is closer to an OM-1, but the E-1 isn't that much heavier
>than an OM-1.
> -mark
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|