On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Timpe, Jim wrote:
>
> Mark said:
>
> The E-1 isn't that big:
>
> E-1: 141mm x 104mm x 81mm 660g
> OM-1: 136mm x 83mm x 50mm 510g
> E-300: 146.5mm x 85mm x 64mm 580g
>
> Sure the E-300 is closer to an OM-1, but the E-1 isn't that much heavier
> than an OM-1.
> -mark
>
> 30% is significant to me. I only handled an E-1 briefly for an afternoon,
> and have only had the E-300 for about a week now, but it does feel closer to
> OM-ness. How's that for scientific, y'all?
Nah, a 1Ds MKII at 1565g is significant :-)
-mark
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|