That makes sense, too. I guess I was thinking about getting from the car to
it, not what the 2X factor would make it look like from the same distance.
It's that wide-angle mentality, I suppose.
Walt
--
"Anything more than 500 yards from
the car just isn't photogenic." --
Edward Weston
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: ScottGee1 <scottgee1@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> I was thinking you would get the same image size from 1000 yards away
> - as if that's any consolation.
>
> On 6/3/05, Walt Wayman <hiwayman@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Actually, because of the 2X factor, wouldn't it be 250 yards? Suits me
> > even
> better, being old, gimpy, lazy, and getting fat. :-)
> >
> > Walt
> >
> > --
> > "Anything more than 500 yards from
> > the car just isn't photogenic." --
> > Edward Weston
> >
> > -------------- Original message ----------------------
> > From: ScottGee1 <scottgee1@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Because of the 2X factor on the lenses, Walt may have to change the
> > > Weston quote in his sig to 1,000 yards.
> > >
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|