You clearly need them all.
OK, perhaps not practical. A lot of the question comes down to $$$.
Personally, I love the 85/2. It is small, light, fast and an incredible
lens. It's also fairly expensive.
I am also a big fan of the 100/2.8. Not much bigger, not quite as fast, but
a superb lens. If I was only going for portraits, this is the lens I'd
choose.
You can't lose with any of them.
Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: "auris ." <aurimero@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 9:30 AM
Subject: [OM] question-portrait lens
>
> Simple question about portrait lens.
>
> I love to draw portraits and I do them often. But I have just 50/1,4
> 50/3,5 and 28/2. I can take portrait just from short distance but then it
> is hard to stay unnoticed. My grandmother don't like to be photographed,
> she said that she is not pretty any more and she always begin laugh then
> notice zuiko is looking at her. In my small om lineup I missed true
> portrait lens. What could you recommend: 85mm 100mm or 135mm? And which of
> them has best performance? 90mm is too expensive for me.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Auris
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Discover Yahoo!
> Find restaurants, movies, travel & more fun for the weekend. Check it out!
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|