Do you think it will reveal its mysteries through a Canyon sensor? 8^0
There are many good lenses in the range, I'm sure, but the 35-80/2.8 is one
of the last Zuikos I would part with.
Joel W.
At 07:38 PM 5/29/2005 +0000, you wrote:
>Just as I suspected. It does something I can't quite put my finger
>on. I'm holding onto mine until I too become a sinner, even if I decide
>to stick it on a C*n*n.
>
>Walt
>
>--
>"Anything more than 500 yards from
>the car just isn't photogenic." --
>Edward Weston
>
> -------------- Original message ----------------------
>From: Joel Wilcox <jowilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > I was able to do a little shooting yesterday with the 35-80/2.8 on the
> > E-1. I threw together a web page with some of the images, plus a couple
> > with DZ 14-54 for comparison.
> >
> > I am puzzled by the color as captured through the lens. In cool light it
> > seems too cool, and in warm light a little too warm. Easily corrected
> in PP.
> >
> > Bokeh characteristics make it into digital capture pretty well, I
> > think. The very last photo was taken with the ZD 14-54 and may surpass
> the
> > 35-80/2.8 in richness of color in some ways, but the 35-80/2.8 retains a
> > measure of 3-dimensionality that I value the lens for.
> >
> > See what you think:
> >
> > http://soli.inav.net/~jdub/day/ZD-Zu-35-80.html
> >
> > Joel W.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|