| Subject: | [OM] Re: Speck in 100mm f2 |
|---|---|
| From: | hiwayman@xxxxxxx (Walt Wayman) |
| Date: | Fri, 27 May 2005 19:09:26 +0000 |
That was supposed to be "no effect," not "to effect." And I forgot to add: My 100/2 is clean as a whistle. :-) Walt -- "Anything more than 500 yards from the car just isn't photogenic." -- Edward Weston -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: hiwayman@xxxxxxx (Walt Wayman) > It seems to have absolutely to effect... ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Speck in 100mm f2, AG Schnozz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Erwin Puts on the E1, Four Thirds, Olympus, Joel Wilcox |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] OT Questions and Answeres, was Speck in 100mm f2, Chris Barker |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Speck in 100mm f2, Moose |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |