Walt Wayman wrote:
>Mentioning what I wouldn't sell mine for got me to thinking. I don't read the
>digital stuff all that thoroughly, so I may have missed a tidbit or two here
>and there, but I don't recall any of you pixelheads talking about using the
>analog Zuiko zooms on either an E-Thing or even an off-brand DSLR, like a
>C-Thing. I would've thought the 35-80/2.8 Zuiko would be a natural,
>considering its reputation for quality.
>
>Exactly why is that? Don't any of y'all have one? If someone would like to
>donate an E-Thing for a few months, I could check it out. :-)
>
>Walt
>
>--
>"Anything more than 500 yards from
>the car just isn't photogenic." --
>Edward Weston
>==============================================
>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>==============================================
>
>
>
>
>
--
"There is increasing concern, I think, that something not registered on the Net
will not be seen as existing."
Andras Bozoki,
Hungarian Culture Minister
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|