60, if it's critically sharp, works for me. Can't tell from the
screen. And 63, just because people like pretty flower pix!
hth-FWIW/ScottGee1
On 5/26/05, John A. Lind <jalind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm in desperate need of help (the Other Half has been telling me that for
> years) . . .
>
> Got all the prints back yesterday from the "photo contest" in the
> park. Not some of my best work and the mid-day hazy sun was not very good
> lighting. Chopped it down to these nine late last night that looked the
> most interesting (after chopping down another large limb that broke off one
> of my Bradford Pear trees . . . a completely different story.)
>
> Trying to decide now which two to send in (if any) . . .
>
> http://www.betterphoto.com/gallery/big.asp?photoID=925855
>
> http://www.betterphoto.com/gallery/big.asp?photoID=925856
>
> http://www.betterphoto.com/gallery/big.asp?photoID=925857
>
> http://www.betterphoto.com/gallery/big.asp?photoID=925858
>
> http://www.betterphoto.com/gallery/big.asp?photoID=925859
>
> http://www.betterphoto.com/gallery/big.asp?photoID=925860
>
> http://www.betterphoto.com/gallery/big.asp?photoID=925861
>
> http://www.betterphoto.com/gallery/big.asp?photoID=925862
>
> http://www.betterphoto.com/gallery/big.asp?photoID=925863
>
> Comments about which two have the greatest visual impact would be most
> welcome!
>
> Thanks,
> -- John Lind
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|