| Subject: | [OM] Re: (Forscher) NPC & Polaroid question |
|---|---|
| From: | Philippe Le Zuikomane <zuikomane@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 13 May 2005 18:27:13 -0500 |
It sounds indeed quite versatile. Thanks, Piers. -- Phil On 23:56, Piers Hemy wrote: >It must be 25 years since I used it, but Type 665 would be my >nomination Phil - at least you will get a 24x36 negative or two per >frame, from which you could get something bigger than th econtact >prints to which you will otherwise be restricted. > >-- Piers == ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: [Offlist] Re: Resolution cameras are able to deliver, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Photos for your critique, John A. Lind |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: (Forscher) NPC & Polaroid question, Piers Hemy |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: OT - wireless weatherproof webcam, Mike |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |