Thanks for the good words Winsor.
The bad part is that I have no idea what to replace it with. I posted my
impressions of it when I got it a couple of years ago. I don't take pix of
people, but one of the first pix I took was of my pixshy wife as part of test
and getting to know it. It was not even a full headshot portrait and when I
got the Wallyworld special 4X6 print, she exclaimed:
"Do I really look like that"?
You could see every pore on her face...
When it comes to the 8080Wideangle:
I went to the website and copied (below) what the dude said. I was surprised
also to hear his conclusion. This means that 8080 and the A2/A200 are back in
the game to consider, but what I really want is the E-1...
Boris
Which did better? If we're only going to talk about detail and sharpness then
I'd have to hand it to the C-8080 which performed extremely well, delivering
marginally more detail and in fact having slightly more accurate color (reds).
Obviously there's the sensitivity advantage, the C-8080 shot was taken at ISO
50 and the E-300 will perform much better (lower noise) than the C-8080 at
higher sensitivities.
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|