Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: RAW

Subject: [OM] Re: RAW
From: Earl Dunbar <edunbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 20:20:56 -0400
I'm with you and your wife, C.H.  To me the C1 image is very slightly 
cooler in the fleshtones, giving a dull, muddy look.  Might not make as 
big a difference on caucasians.

Earl

C.H.Ling wrote:

>For both images, I prefer the Olympus output, I gave a blind test to my wife 
>and she prefer the same. I think it is a matter of preference, monitor 
>calibration could be one of the reasons but with the latest LCD I don't see 
>it a big problem. My company's cheap 17" LCD just render very close to my 
>mid-range EIZO except less bright even at max setting. I even merge the four 
>images and printed on HP photo paper (with some brightness/contrast 
>adjustment), my wife gave me the same answer,
>
>Since we are seeing quite differently, it is still a mystery.
>
>C.H.Ling
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Mark Dapoz" <md@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>  
>
>>On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, C.H.Ling wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Although they render differently but both are quite nice, I wouldn't say 
>>>C1
>>>is much better in skin tone. Even without any sharpening, C1 start to 
>>>show
>>>artifacts on the lip when viewing at 200%, very sad to see they just 
>>>spent
>>>too little effort on E-1 (while they did very well for C*non RAW).
>>>      
>>>
>>Although both images are acceptable, I still find the Olympus version has 
>>too
>>much red in the skintones.  This becomes even more apparant with a fair 
>>skinned
>>subject (as my family happens to be).  Here's an example of what I mean.
>>
>>Olympus Viewer 1.3: RAW+0.5EV, camera white balance:
>>
>>http://olympus.dementia.org/misc/E-1/E-1_20050412_173846-Oly.jpg
>>
>>C1 1.7: RAW+0.55EV, camera white balance:
>>
>>http://olympus.dementia.org/misc/E-1/E-1_20050412_173846-C1.jpg
>>
>>The C1 version is much closer to the real-life colour than the Olympus 
>>one.
>>Maybe C1 just has a better colour profile than Olympus does.  I agree with 
>>you
>>about the artifacts, C1 does have slightly more artifacts than Olympus but
>>they are minimised if you use the "soft look" sharpening method.
>>-mark
>>    
>>
>
>
>==============================================
>List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
>List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>==============================================
>
>
>  
>



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz