Subject: | [OM] Re: OM size vs small RFs, was Relative costs ... |
---|---|
From: | Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:54:58 +1000 |
Got the R3a and 40Nokton yet? :-) AndrewF http://www.pbase.com/afildes On 27/04/2005, at 10:28 PM, Rick Beckrich wrote: > Actually, I started with OMs because they felt so much like the L**** > IIIf > I had been using for years. Recently I've backslid into the RF trap > again. > First with old Russian stuff, than added two CV Bessa (L & R). Rick ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: #122, Richard Lovison |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: OM size vs small RFs, was Relative costs ..., ScottGee1 |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: OM size vs small RFs, was Relative costs ..., Rick Beckrich |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: OM size vs small RFs, was Relative costs ..., ScottGee1 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |