I've never seen it, but could the aperture cast into body actually not be
square with the path of the film?
John Hermanson
Camtech Photo Services, Inc.
21 South Lane, Huntington, NY, 11743-4714,
631-424-2121, www.zuiko.com
Olympus OM Service since 1977
<:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:>
----- Original Message -----
From: "AG Schnozz" <agschnozz@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 2:21 PM
Subject: [OM] Re: WTB: grid screen, 1-14, Grip 1, Eyecup 2
>> Back from holiday and reviewing my pix. Long story short -
>> too many tilts! I better get a grid screen.
>
> Just a thought here, but you might want to look at the negs. One
> of my cameras has a very strange alignment problem where the
> film frames are off in alignment by 1 millimeter. The frame is
> actually rotated on the film slightly.
>
> CLA's and careful inspection have never found the cause. I just
> chalk it up to around 80-100,000 exposures. Not really worth
> worrying about at this point. I guess I can blame it on the
> fact it's an OM-2S as they're not supposed to last past five
> rolls of film.
>
> AG
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|