Well we could get all philosophical here. What *is* a name, after all. We
will have to seek the advice of two particular list members to find out what
they 'ken' by the term, so to speak. AG?? Moose??
What is for sure is that Ceorge is not usually called Chuck, as I tried to
address him in my post! Sorry chucks (he said, trying to put on a
Liverpudlian lilt).
--
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Chris Barker
Sent: 17 April 2005 18:51
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: re What's a Fang?
Sorry if I'm missing something Piers, but that was her name; at least that
is what I understood ;-). This is part of an email dated 8 November 2000:
> If you have any questions at all, feel free to ask. Be sure to let
> me know how your results turn out.
>
>
> Cheers,
> *= Doris Fang =*
I still have her address from then, as I kept several of her posts; if
anyone were interested i could send it to them direct. She knew loads of
stuff did Doris.
Chris
On 17 Apr 2005, at 17:42, Piers Hemy wrote:
> As I recall Chuck, there is sufficient data around in the list and the
> peripheral sources to pin down an email address, and thence an
> identity for the person who used the nom-de-guerre "Doris Fang", if
> you are so minded.
> Suffice it to say that anybody blessed with the given name "Doris
> Fang" is not "our Doris".
>
> --
> Piers
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|