AG Schnozz wrote:
>I've got to say, that the 14-54 lens that came with this E-1 is
>beyond outstanding! Very little optical distortion
>(barrel/pincushion) and very close focusing!
>
>
Congats! And what's the new baby's name? :-)
>......
>Did you know that the E-1 with 14-54 is almost identical in
>size/shape/weight to my OM-4, with Winder-2 and 200/4?
>
>
And that's good? Lets see now, 54mm is 108mm eq. for 35mm and the lens
is f3.5 at 54mm. How does it compare to OM-4 with no winder and 100/2.8?
>Any thoughts that the 20D was the way to go have been
>effectively neutralized. Even my idiotic test shots rock! ISO
>400 is absolutely not a problem. 3200 is a disaster, but
>actually about the same as my A1 at 400.
>
>
As a few of us have been gently pointing out from time to time, the
difference between the smaller sensors of the Prosumers and the DSLRs is
really a BIG deal. All of the current DSLRs take really wonderful images.
>But that lens is definitely a "Wow!"
>
>AG (the joy of new toys) Schnozz
>
>
How fun for you!
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|