It's OK Mike, I understand what you mean now (having read Moose's
post); I was not being very perceptive ... ;-)
But it seems like a whole lot of work and time for putting one image on
the web.
Chris
On 25 Mar 2005, at 04:52, Mike wrote:
> Woke up the Madrugada Mutt before the crack of dawn Sun the 13th. She's
> a real sound sleeper and worthless watchdog so I had to kick the
> doghouse to get her up. Headed out to see if we could get a possible
> TOPE shot or two in the can. I can't comment on that yet but did get
> this fellow a little after sunup.
> http://www.interisland.net/watershed/mike/WalkDogs/eagle2.jpg (202kb)
> http://www.interisland.net/watershed/mike/WalkDogs/eagle2a.jpg (132kb)
>
> He/she was eyeing this fellow and mates.
> http://www.interisland.net/watershed/mike/WalkDogs/rabbit1.jpg (116kb)
>
> The second shot is a blown up crop of the first to better show some
> more
> of the detail in the original scan. I used the OM4T, Tamron 300/2.8
> with
> stacked 2xa and 1.4xa on the Gitzo Studex steadied by hand. Still, not
> the most stable set up. Wasn't practical to use the self timer as the
> wind was a bit gusty. Fuji 400. Wish I hadn't used up all the Reala.
> Scanned on the FS4000. This is the first time I tried reducing the pic
> using a technique posted on photo net a while back. Basically apply a
> lot of sharpening at first then reduce size by half, sharpen less and
> reduce by half, sharpen even less, reduce, etc. I wasn't able to follow
> the process exactly without converting to 8bit. Anyway the result _is_
> sharper but I don't like the grainy background much. I guess i need to
> experiment some more.
>
> Mike
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
