| Subject: | [OM] Re: 21mm F2 and 24mm f2 - worth the extra over the slower 21 and 24 zuikos? |
|---|---|
| From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 24 Mar 2005 20:53:07 -0800 |
AG Schnozz wrote: >I'm on my second 24/2.8. Plumb wore out the first. In the wide >angles (wider than 28mm) I really don't care what version it is >(F2, F2.8, F3.5, 21mm, 24mm) as long as it's multicoated. > And how do you find those in silvernose? The inquiring Moose ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Out after TOPE shot, Mike |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Olympus Odyssey - last call for participants, Andrew McPhee |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: 21mm F2 and 24mm f2 - worth the extra over the slower 21 and 24 zuikos?, Thomas Clausen |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: 21mm F2 and 24mm f2 - worth the extra over the slower 21 and 24 zuikos?, AG Schnozz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |