Subject: | [OM] Re: 21mm F2 and 24mm f2 - worth the extra over the slower 21 and 24 zuikos? |
---|---|
From: | Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:26:09 -0800 |
With the 28/2 on your camera and an 85/2 in your pocket you can go anywhere. Winsor Long Beach, California, USA On Mar 24, 2005, at 12:35 PM, Martin Walters wrote: > I have always used a 28mm as my wide angle (a 3.5, now upgraded to a > later model 28/2). ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Olympus Odyssey for house movers, Timpe, Jim |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Olympus Odyssey for house movers, Gary W. Marklund |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: 21mm F2 and 24mm f2 - worth the extra over the slower 21 and 24 zuikos?, Martin Walters |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: 21mm F2 and 24mm f2 - worth the extra over the slower 21 and 24 zuikos?, Rob Harrison |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |