GeeBee wrote:
>Hi Chris,
>
>I think it is a nice scene but I also think it helps that I stick to the
>rules :-) Thanks for looking.
>
>
I'd go with nice scene, not rule of thirds. Church tower is 25% from
left edge, not 33%, let alone the 38% of the golden mean. Horizon at
about 42-43% from bottom.
Not carping, as I subscribe to the rule of what looks good to me, not
the rule of whatever. And this one looks good to me. :-)
>From: "Chris Barker" <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>Subject: [OM] Re: #085
>
>>An interesting composition Graham. I suppose that it works so well
>>because the horizon is one third the way up at either end, and the
>>church, which stands out well despite the distance and its resultant
>>size, is at the intersection of the thirds.
>>
>>Or it is just an enjoyable scene; I do like those painterly clouds ...
>>
>>
Me too. Clouds are just more interesting more often in some places than
others, I think. One thing I really regretted about screwing up that
roll of film in Maine was some amazing cloud/sky shots I lost. I know
Montana is Big Sky Country, but Maine has some too.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|