Chuckle!
If spending the cash is an obstacle to trimming the shot, it seems to me
more than obvious that you *need* a 24mm shift. That then solves both
problems - you spend even more cash, and you don't need to trim the shot!
"Sorted", as I believe one says.
BTW I got 404s from both links in your post.
--
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of GeeBee
Sent: 22 March 2005 16:53
To: OM List
Subject: [OM] #086 #087
--snip
I have been told, by someone with more photographic clout than me, that
cropping the bottom off this shot would improve it. I tend to agree but:
1. neither version will get a mention when they write the history of the
world.
2. I paid a lot of cash for the 21mm and I am too stubborn to crop the
results to a 35mm.
--snip
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|