> >I was rather disappointed by what I got with the 135/2,8 + 1.5xTC
>>(Kenko): most pictures were not sharp, probably a problem with
>>focussing or rather a difficulty in handling the lens steady, I don't
>>know.
>>
>Are you sure it isn't the teleconverter? At least here, Kenko has the
>reputation of being on the cheap, rather than the quality, end of
>brands. I wouldn't buy a Kenko lens.
>
Hmmm, sorry, I meant Kiron, not Kenko ! And I guess the problem was
more in my handling the 135/2.8 + TC combo rather than its quality,
because some (few) of the pics were indeed sharp. Why would this
combo be more difficult to hand hold in a stable way than a 180/2.8,
I don't know.
Bernard
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|