Scott
Welcome to the List. The 4T and 4Ti are indeed identical except for
the designation, the 4T having been named so for the US market for some
reason.
I have the OM-4 which is not far different, but when I tried a 4T for a
while I preferred that. It might have been that it was slightly newer
than my 4, but it also had a slightly different display, a more
attractive grey colour in the viewfinder. It was also perhaps a little
lighter, although that could have been my imagination. The overall
feeling of quality was wonderful.
I sold my 4T to rationalise my line-up and to finance a Conta* G2 set.
That was a lovely camera, but I did not really use it much and, having
sold a Bronica RF set to finance my Olympus E-1, I am now back with a
Bronica RF, selling my G2 to finance it!
Chris
On 18 Mar 2005, at 04:58, ScottGee1 wrote:
> BTW, my understanding is that the OM-4T and Ti are identical - is that
> correct?
>
> Thanks!/ScottGee1
>
~~ >-)-
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
+44 (0)7092 251126
www.threeshoes.co.uk
homepage.mac.com/zuiko
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|