Earl Dunbar wrote:
> SACD? Hardly unsucessful as far as high-res music optical discs go.
> I'd say it has a good chance to win vs DVD-A.
Maybe within its niche it's a "winner," though it had about a year's
headstart over DVD-A and it still is not decisively in the lead.
Among the general public, both SACD _and_ DVD-A are non-starters. MP3,
AAC, QuickTime, and Windows Media have done far better as far as public
acceptance, number/variety of devices for playback, etc.
Steve
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|