Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: (2) SR44 vs (1) CR1/3N in OM-4Ti

Subject: [OM] Re: (2) SR44 vs (1) CR1/3N in OM-4Ti
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 02:08:49 -0800
Piers Hemy wrote:

>Use of lithium cells has been covered before, Rob. 
>
>It's a no-no 
>
Correct.

>because of the constant low drain the OM imposes (perhaps that
>is why you had to replace them).
>
Weeellll, not really. It's because they have both declining voltage with 
age and use and they have too much voltage drop at high drain. Neither 
characteristic is compatable with lengthy or reliable use with any of 
the SR44/357 using OM bodies.

Moose



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz