Gee, I almost did a rant on this and realized I would be sabotaging
someone's sale, as would he if he answered your question.
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On Feb 27, 2005, at 6:31 AM, John Hudson wrote:
> For the very very slight retardation in image quality on the down side
> and
> the protection of the front lens element on the upside, why would
> anyone
> want to discard a high quality UV/sky filter costing relatively little
> and
> jeopardize one's lens?
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|