Winsor Crosby wrote:
>Looks like a very substantial improvement. Very nice.
>
Yep, smaller, lighter, faster, less noise, more mps, adds back important
features left out of the 300D and adds other real improvements.
BUT (Moose not happy with a Can*n DSLR? Gasp!). They have achieved much
of the size/weight reduction simply by going to a smaller battery, with
65% of the capacity, from the S60/70. This may be OK for much use, if
the new processor is more energy efficient (but what about the built-in
flash??), but it means it isn't an attractive addition for anyone with
the existing DLSRs that all use a different battery.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|