We'd tried one at work some time ago - probably an earlier model. The
results from that one were clearly colour laser in quality and while
the solid ink is a nice idea, it burns through the sticks fairly
quickly and they are very expensive, with no third party inks available
that I could find (and I looked quite hard). We decided "no thanks."
AndrewF
On 17/02/2005, at 3:56 PM, Rob Harrison wrote:
> The Xerox 8400 is looking pretty good to me.
>
> <http://www.office.xerox.com/perl-bin/product.pl?product=8400>
>
> I've had nothing but grief from the ink jet devices I've had, whereas
> laser
> printers have run for years with no trouble.
>
> The solid ink appeals to me. Like crayons you stick in, replace
> whenever you
> want, as I understand it.
>
> The photos I've seen printed on it seem pretty darn nice, though I
> haven't
> run any of my own through one to compare.
>
> Rob Harrison
> Seattle
>
> On 2/16/05 10:45 AM, "Chris Barker" <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Inkjets have always been more
>> expensive to use as document printers than lasers. I have not looked
>> at colour lasers recently, but I wonder how the comparison works now.
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|