Subject: | [OM] Re: Calumet |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 15 Feb 2005 22:50:08 -0800 |
Jim Brokaw wrote: >I got the 16/3.5 fisheye... I haven't seen it yet, but the price is right. >Longtime listers will recall that I have a 16/3.5 fisheye in good shape in >most ways but missing the rearmost two elements due to fungus damage in the >past... so this lens will be a parts lens if the 'front element scuffs' are >really an issue. Otherwise I'll just use it as-is. > Hey, that's great Jim! You have been looking for a loooong time. Moose ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: An Image from the Archives, Jim Brokaw |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Buying advice: Which printer?, James Royall |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Calumet, Jim Brokaw |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Calumet, Martyn Smoothy |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |