on 2/15/05 8:50 AM, Natalia at lilredspy@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> Jeff Keller wrote:
>
> Natalia, it seems your affair with OM's was pretty short. Dare I ask the
>
> identity of your new affection?
>
> -jeff
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hey, Jeff.
>
>
>
> My new affection is toward rangefinders....But I pulled the plug on my OM-4
>
> auction at the last moment. I kept having second thoughts. Now I a
>
> Voigtlander (gosh, it took me a couple of days to learn to spell this
>
> correctly) Bessa R2A body. Lenses for Bessa will have to wait for now.
>
>
>
> Looks like I'll be around;)
>
>
>
> ~Natalia
>
> ----
>
> nataliaworthington.com
Well, I'm on both the OM list and the CV list, and my rangefinder affection
(or is it affliction...?) is for brand "L", though my budget hasn't
supported it fully (yet...) but I find no incompatibility between OM's and
rangefinders in general. OM's, being both smaller and more elegantly
designed than many SLR's operate well with rangefinders. There are some
things that SLR's do better, and for those the OM is better than many SLR's,
particularly the OM-4/4T series, with the multi-spot meter.
--
Jim Brokaw
OM-'s of all sorts, and no OM-oney...
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|