I know I might be becoming very annoying with this statement, but is it,
because you feel like the OM viewfinder is too close to your eyes?
Before, I got used to it, my horizions were not always straight...:)
Boris
P.S. Good for macro, but landscapes are an effort. Still wont trade it for
another brand (not the case with their digital line though...:)
Cameras considered before buying into the OM line:
Nikon F2 (?) the one that is still made and is priced approximately $650
K1000
Other fully manual cameras from Pentax, Canon and Minolta accused to be
"venerable". Used Praktica along with the OM's, but stopped, coz no one
repairs them.
Earl Dunbar <edunbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I went out today w/ an OM-2n, 21/2, 35/2.8, 100/2.8 (thanks Bill Barber)
and an RC. I am so out of shape visually; i.e., I can't "see" through
the OM viewfinder as I used to. Strangely, I connected with the RC
viewfinder far more easily. Don't know why that is, and I'm sure my OM
vision will return with practice/use. Anyone have any ideas?
The scary thing is, I found myself surfing the Voigtlander/Bessa sight
last night... I wish Olympus had stuck with the Ace and developed it
further.
Earl
Rob Harrison wrote:
>LOL - I was amazed myself--and the 35 shift was newly CLA'd by Clint! I
>think it's that L*ica bug he's been bitten by. I'm really pleased with what
>I'm seeing through the viewfinder with both lenses. Can't wait to get the
>first roll back.
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|