Sometimes the "technical flaws" bring to the picture what it needs to be great.
I really thought the picture of Elin was great the way you posted it the first
time, except for the drop under the chin. It had atmosphere, now it is yet
another picture of a pretty girl.
I think this version has lost a lot (but admit that technically is much better)
and in addition, I can see something funky around the face and the water
(oversharpen?)
Just an opinion
I did not comment on the other pictures, but thought about it:
The first one might benefit if you place the person using the rules of the
thirds and crop from bottom and right. I don't know if it is going to work,
have you tried it? And darken slightly the face as Winsor suggested.
I still don't know what to offer about the next two, but for the last, I saw
your latest work and the only thing I can suggest is to remove the branch on
the left and maybe some of the little sticks above it that make the picture so
busy.
Boris
Johan Malmstrom <jom@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Re-scanned and modified in PS...
/ Johan
>
> Karin:
>
> OM-4, Ilford FP4+, D-76
>
> Elin:
>
> OM-4, Ilford FP4+, D-76
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|