Johan:
I think 27 is the best of the lot. The others (except for 12) suffer
from depth of field problems. But wow, 27 is a very nice photo.
Earl
Johan Malmstrom wrote:
>OM-Photogs!
>
>I have four photos that I would like hear your opinion on. I can take
>strong critics... I would also like some hints on the technical side,
>what to think about when making the fine print and so on.
>
>Please look and respond! I like them, but then you should kill your
>darlings.
>
>1
><http://foto.johanmalmstrom.se/index.php?
>dnode=220&cat=vinter_skog&pict=PX040222-12.jpg>
>
>2
><http://foto.johanmalmstrom.se/index.php?
>dnode=220&cat=vinter_skog&pict=PX040222-1.jpg>
>
>3
><http://foto.johanmalmstrom.se/index.php?
>dnode=220&cat=vinter_skog&pict=PX040222-2.jpg>
>
>4
><http://foto.johanmalmstrom.se/index.php?
>dnode=220&cat=vinter_skog&pict=PX040222-27.jpg>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|