Wayne Harridge wrote:
>Well said.
>
>Take a look at some of the most well known and respected photographs from the
>last
>150 years, most of these have technical faults (not really sharp, poor
>contrast due to
>incorrect exposure, etc, etc.). So what is it that makes these photographs
>great ?
>
Slavish emulation of the opinions of others?*
I find some of the 'great' photos of the past to indeed be great - and
others to be, well... not so great.
Moose
This is not a personal attack on you or anyone else in particular, just
an observation of the basis for many opinions of art that I have
encountered.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|