Moose:
>>> If I find the time to test, I'll put up a general scene with a tripod and
>>> the 50f2, 50f1.4, 50f1.8, 40f2 and the 35-80f2.8 (that's the standard lenses
>>> I have available.
>>>
> My usual question, which versions of the 1.8 and 1.4, it makes a big
> difference. A lot of sloppy mentions of the quality of these lenses
> lately without mention of version.
I have a nice 1.4 > 1.1XX.XXX available, and two late MIJ f1.8's
>>>
> Works for me.
>
>>> This lens + an OM3/4 is my equivalent of "a rangefinder + 35mm" with an
>>> added macro feature!
>>>
>>>
> ICK! Just when you had me going! I don't like rangefiinders, so anything
> that makes my OM like one sounds bad. :-) ;-)
Sorry, me neither - was just referring to HCB's set-up.
>
> I still doesn't have any desire for a 50/2. 50/3.5 for serious macro and
> 50/1.4>1,100,000 for general use, with Viv 2x Telemacro for less
> serious, but nonetheless great macro.
Iwert.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|