Hi Winsor,
I missed the trashing so I'm not aware of the complaints expressed by
other list members. I make do with what I have and can afford though I
would love to own either a 35-70/3.6, 35-105/3.5-4.5 or if I dream
really big, a 35-80/2.8.
I'm not sure by what you mean, "however did I do that?" Are you
referring to sharpness? That scan is actually less sharp than the 4x6
print in the fine details. The shot was at either f11 or f16 and I
used a tripod, a Velbon Chase EFL-4 with a Velbon PH360 pan head that I
absolutely love. :)
Richard
--- Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> And taken by the lens that was recently trashed by a couple of people
>
> on the list. However did you do that?
> On Jan 19, 2005, at 12:57 PM, Richard Lovison wrote:
>
> > OM-4t : Zuiko 35-70/4
> >
> > http://people.simons-rock.edu/rlovison/temp/Winter1.html
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|