Subject: | [OM] Re: Evolt review |
---|---|
From: | Mike <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:04:52 -0800 |
> > >But buying the 18 >month old E-1 isn't that appealing either. > 18 months! Geehz! And people are starting to say the same thing about 30 _year_ old OM1's. Mike ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: [OT] Tsunami Images, Piers Hemy |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Praising the OM-1 was Re: Re: Evolt review, Johan Malmstrom |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Evolt review, Jan Steinman |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Praising the OM-1 was Re: Re: Evolt review, Johan Malmstrom |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |